Shields v. Stone Hill Minerals Holdings, LLC

Court

District Court, N.D. West Virginia (N.D.W. Va.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

John Preston Bailey · 1,091 cases in index

Docket number

5:24-cv-00039

Cause

28:1332 Diversity-Fraud
28 U.S.C. § 1332 — Diversity jurisdiction

Nature of suit

370 Other Fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category.

Jurisdiction

Diversity

Jury demand

Both

Date filed

03/01/2024

246 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Shields · 735 cases
• defendant · Stone Hill Minerals Holdings, LLC

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 2 Personal Property / Fraud cases in our index naming Stone Hill Minerals Holdings, LLC — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits

These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Shields v. Stone Hill Minerals Holdings, LLC?

Shields v. Stone Hill Minerals Holdings, LLC is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 03/01/2024 in the District Court, N.D. West Virginia. The case is currently open in the federal court system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, N.D. West Virginia, docket number 5:24-cv-00039.

When was the case filed?

Shields v. Stone Hill Minerals Holdings, LLC was filed on 03/01/2024. The case is currently open.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 28 U.S.C. § 1332 — Diversity jurisdiction.