Sitz v. Irs
Sitz v. Irs is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 12/04/2015 in the District Court, E.D. Michigan. The case was terminated on 01/27/2017.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Michigan (E.D. Mich.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Thomas L. Ludington · 1,531 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:15-cv-14246
- Nature of suit
- 870 Tax suits
Federal tax disputes with the United States as a party. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 12/04/2015
- Date terminated
- 01/27/2017
8,346 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Sitz v. Irs?
Sitz v. Irs is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 12/04/2015 in the District Court, E.D. Michigan. The case was terminated on 01/27/2017. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Michigan, docket number 1:15-cv-14246.
When was the case filed?
Sitz v. Irs was filed on 12/04/2015. It was terminated on 01/27/2017.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 13385689 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:15-cv-14246 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).