Smith,r v. Ignatius Heim
Smith,r v. Ignatius Heim is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 10/10/1985 in the District Court, D. Kansas. The case was terminated on 09/03/1987.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Kansas (D. Kan.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 385 Property damage - Product liability
Property damage caused by an allegedly defective product. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 10/10/1985
- Date terminated
- 09/03/1987
2,521 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Smith,r · 11 cases
- defendant · Ignatius Heim
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Smith,r v. Ignatius Heim?
Smith,r v. Ignatius Heim is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 10/10/1985 in the District Court, D. Kansas. The case was terminated on 09/03/1987. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Kansas.
When was the case filed?
Smith,r v. Ignatius Heim was filed on 10/10/1985. It was terminated on 09/03/1987.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8708083 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).