Smith v. Does 1-5
Smith v. Does 1-5 is a federal rico / consumer / other statutes lawsuit filed on 05/28/2020 in the District Court, D. Nevada. The case was terminated on 12/15/2020.
- Court
- District Court, D. Nevada (D. Nev.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Kent J. Dawson · 2,049 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:20-cv-00959
- Nature of suit
- 480 Consumer credit
Claims under consumer-credit statutes such as the Fair Credit Reporting Act and Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 05/28/2020
- Date terminated
- 12/15/2020
2,505 RICO / Consumer / Other Statutes cases in this court are indexed here.
About RICO / Consumer / Other Statutes Lawsuits
This group covers federal statutory claims such as RICO (racketeering), consumer-protection statutes, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and other federal causes of action that don't fall under a more specific category.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Smith v. Does 1-5?
Smith v. Does 1-5 is a federal rico / consumer / other statutes lawsuit filed on 05/28/2020 in the District Court, D. Nevada. The case was terminated on 12/15/2020. This group covers federal statutory claims such as RICO (racketeering), consumer-protection statutes, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and other federal causes of action that don't fall under a more specific category.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “RICO / Consumer / Other Statutes” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal statutory claims such as RICO (racketeering), consumer-protection statutes, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and other federal causes of action that don't fall under a more specific category.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Nevada, docket number 2:20-cv-00959.
When was the case filed?
Smith v. Does 1-5 was filed on 05/28/2020. It was terminated on 12/15/2020.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related RICO / Consumer / Other Statutes Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record (docket 18355249).