Smith v. Van Winkle
Smith v. Van Winkle is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 10/29/1992 in the District Court, N.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 05/25/1994.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Texas (N.D. Tex.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Jorge A Solis · 4,644 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:92-cv-02241
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 10/29/1992
- Date terminated
- 05/25/1994
1,967 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Smith · 34133 cases
- defendant · Van Winkle · 125 cases
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Smith v. Van Winkle?
Smith v. Van Winkle is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 10/29/1992 in the District Court, N.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 05/25/1994. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Texas, docket number 3:92-cv-02241.
When was the case filed?
Smith v. Van Winkle was filed on 10/29/1992. It was terminated on 05/25/1994.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9787760 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:92-cv-02241 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).