Snodgress v. Gmac Mortgage
Snodgress v. Gmac Mortgage is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 11/04/2010 in the District Court, D. Utah. The case was terminated on 10/04/2012.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Utah (D. Utah)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Tena Campbell · 2,852 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:10-cv-01096
- Nature of suit
- 290 Other real property actions
Real-property disputes not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 11/04/2010
- Date terminated
- 10/04/2012
669 Other Civil cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Snodgress · 2 cases
- defendant · Gmac Mortgage · 119 cases
Other Cases Naming This Defendant
GMAC Mortgage is named in 119 federal civil cases in this index. Recent Other Civil cases naming the same defendant:
About Other Civil Lawsuits
These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Snodgress v. Gmac Mortgage?
Snodgress v. Gmac Mortgage is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 11/04/2010 in the District Court, D. Utah. The case was terminated on 10/04/2012. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Other Civil” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Utah, docket number 2:10-cv-01096.
When was the case filed?
Snodgress v. Gmac Mortgage was filed on 11/04/2010. It was terminated on 10/04/2012.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Other Civil Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 12826799 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:10-cv-01096 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).