Sofyan v. Jett
Sofyan v. Jett is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 05/27/2009 in the District Court, S.D. Indiana. The case was terminated on 11/24/2009.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. Indiana (S.D. Ind.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Larry J. McKinney · 6,818 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:09-cv-00187
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 05/27/2009
- Date terminated
- 11/24/2009
633 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Sofyan v. Jett?
Sofyan v. Jett is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 05/27/2009 in the District Court, S.D. Indiana. The case was terminated on 11/24/2009. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. Indiana, docket number 2:09-cv-00187.
When was the case filed?
Sofyan v. Jett was filed on 05/27/2009. It was terminated on 11/24/2009.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 18011882 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:09-cv-00187 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).