Spicer v. Pryor
Spicer v. Pryor is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 12/27/1999 in the District Court, M.D. Alabama. The case was terminated on 08/25/2000.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, M.D. Alabama (M.D. Ala.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- John L. Carroll · 270 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:99-cv-01521
- Nature of suit
- 890 Other statutory actions
Federal statutory claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 12/27/1999
- Date terminated
- 08/25/2000
811 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Spicer v. Pryor?
Spicer v. Pryor is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 12/27/1999 in the District Court, M.D. Alabama. The case was terminated on 08/25/2000. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, M.D. Alabama, docket number 2:99-cv-01521.
When was the case filed?
Spicer v. Pryor was filed on 12/27/1999. It was terminated on 08/25/2000.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 11107920 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:99-cv-01521 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).