Stack v. DeAngelo Brothers, LLC

Court

District Court, D. Massachusetts (D. Mass.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Rya W. Zobel · 4,505 cases in index

Docket number

1:17-cv-11006

Cause

28:1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
28 U.S.C. § 1332 — Diversity jurisdiction

Nature of suit

790 Labor: Other
Labor disputes not covered by a more specific category.

Jurisdiction

Diversity

Jury demand

Both

Date filed

05/31/2017

9,847 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Stack · 160 cases
• defendant · DeAngelo Brothers, LLC · 8 cases

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 9 Labor cases in our index naming DeAngelo Brothers, LLC — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

About Labor Lawsuits

Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Stack v. DeAngelo Brothers, LLC?

Stack v. DeAngelo Brothers, LLC is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 05/31/2017 in the District Court, D. Massachusetts. The case is currently open in the federal court system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, D. Massachusetts, docket number 1:17-cv-11006.

When was the case filed?

Stack v. DeAngelo Brothers, LLC was filed on 05/31/2017. The case is currently open.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 28 U.S.C. § 1332 — Diversity jurisdiction.