Sun v. Li
Sun v. Li is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 01/31/1997 in the District Court, D. Maryland. The case was terminated on 02/17/1999.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Maryland (D. Maryland)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- J. Frederick Motz · 5,801 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:97-cv-00314
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 01/31/1997
- Date terminated
- 02/17/1999
2,194 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Sun v. Li?
Sun v. Li is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 01/31/1997 in the District Court, D. Maryland. The case was terminated on 02/17/1999. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Maryland, docket number 1:97-cv-00314.
When was the case filed?
Sun v. Li was filed on 01/31/1997. It was terminated on 02/17/1999.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 28570466 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:97-cv-00314 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).