T.E.F v. Dasen
T.E.F v. Dasen is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 06/06/2005 in the District Court, D. Montana. The case was terminated on 12/02/2005.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Montana (D. Mont.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Leif B. Erickson · 301 cases in index
- Docket number
- 9:05-cv-00096
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 06/06/2005
- Date terminated
- 12/02/2005
386 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is T.E.F v. Dasen?
T.E.F v. Dasen is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 06/06/2005 in the District Court, D. Montana. The case was terminated on 12/02/2005. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Montana, docket number 9:05-cv-00096.
When was the case filed?
T.E.F v. Dasen was filed on 06/06/2005. It was terminated on 12/02/2005.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 21913716 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 9:05-cv-00096 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).