Tanenbaum v. Foster
Tanenbaum v. Foster is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 09/28/1989 in the District Court, N.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 06/04/1990.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Ohio (N.D. Ohio)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- 1:89-cv-01860
- Nature of suit
- 791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Disputes over employee benefit and pension plans under ERISA. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 09/28/1989
- Date terminated
- 06/04/1990
12,816 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.
About Labor Lawsuits
Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Tanenbaum v. Foster?
Tanenbaum v. Foster is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 09/28/1989 in the District Court, N.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 06/04/1990. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Ohio, docket number 1:89-cv-01860.
When was the case filed?
Tanenbaum v. Foster was filed on 09/28/1989. It was terminated on 06/04/1990.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Labor Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9023054 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:89-cv-01860 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).