Docket Nexus — Federal court records.
Copyright Lawsuit

Tcyk, LLC v. Does, Et Al

Copyright Terminated 03/24/2014 District Court, S.D. Iowa

Tcyk, LLC v. Does, Et Al is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 06/13/2013 in the District Court, S.D. Iowa. The case was terminated on 03/24/2014.

A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.

Court
District Court, S.D. Iowa (S.D. Iowa)
Official Court Website →
Docket number
Nature of suit
820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works.
Jurisdiction
Federal question
Date filed
06/13/2013
Date terminated
03/24/2014

281 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

  • plaintiff · Tcyk, LLC · 87 cases
  • defendant · Does · 1033 cases

About Copyright Lawsuits

Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Tcyk, LLC v. Does, Et Al?

Tcyk, LLC v. Does, Et Al is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 06/13/2013 in the District Court, S.D. Iowa. The case was terminated on 03/24/2014. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, S.D. Iowa.

When was the case filed?

Tcyk, LLC v. Does, Et Al was filed on 06/13/2013. It was terminated on 03/24/2014.

Other Cases Involving These Parties

Related Copyright Cases

Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 62866396 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).