Thermos Co v. Igloo Prod Corp

Court

District Court, N.D. Illinois (N.D. Ill.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Wayne R. Andersen · 4,322 cases in index

Docket number

1:93-cv-05826

Cause

15:1051 Trademark Infringement
15 U.S.C. § 1051 — Lanham (Trademark) Act

Nature of suit

840 Trademark
Infringement or dilution of a trademark under the Lanham Act.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

None

Date filed

09/23/1993

Date terminated

03/04/1996

8,043 Trademark cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Thermos Co · 16 cases
• defendant · Igloo Prod Corp · 4 cases

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 5 Trademark cases in our index naming Igloo Prod Corp — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

About Trademark Lawsuits

Trademark lawsuits allege infringement or dilution of a brand name, logo, or other mark under the Lanham Act — typically claims that one party's use is likely to confuse consumers about the source of goods or services.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Thermos Co v. Igloo Prod Corp?

Thermos Co v. Igloo Prod Corp is a federal trademark lawsuit filed on 09/23/1993 in the District Court, N.D. Illinois. The case was terminated on 03/04/1996. Trademark lawsuits allege infringement or dilution of a brand name, logo, or other mark under the Lanham Act — typically claims that one party's use is likely to confuse consumers about the source of goods or services.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Trademark” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Trademark lawsuits allege infringement or dilution of a brand name, logo, or other mark under the Lanham Act — typically claims that one party's use is likely to confuse consumers about the source of goods or services.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, N.D. Illinois, docket number 1:93-cv-05826.

When was the case filed?

Thermos Co v. Igloo Prod Corp was filed on 09/23/1993. It was terminated on 03/04/1996.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 15 U.S.C. § 1051 — Lanham (Trademark) Act.