Tineo v. Cigna Helathplan
Tineo v. Cigna Helathplan is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 09/16/1987 in the District Court, D. Arizona. The case was terminated on 07/22/1988.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Arizona (D. Ariz.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 790 Other labor litigation
Labor disputes not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 09/16/1987
- Date terminated
- 07/22/1988
4,490 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Tineo · 26 cases
- defendant · Cigna Helathplan
About Labor Lawsuits
Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Tineo v. Cigna Helathplan?
Tineo v. Cigna Helathplan is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 09/16/1987 in the District Court, D. Arizona. The case was terminated on 07/22/1988. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Arizona.
When was the case filed?
Tineo v. Cigna Helathplan was filed on 09/16/1987. It was terminated on 07/22/1988.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Labor Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8669312 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).