Tool v. Advanced Cutting Tool
Tool v. Advanced Cutting Tool is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 11/20/1985 in the District Court, E.D. Michigan. The case was terminated on 05/19/1989.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Michigan (E.D. Mich.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 11/20/1985
- Date terminated
- 05/19/1989
1,589 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Tool · 7 cases
- defendant · Advanced Cutting Tool
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Tool v. Advanced Cutting Tool?
Tool v. Advanced Cutting Tool is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 11/20/1985 in the District Court, E.D. Michigan. The case was terminated on 05/19/1989. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Michigan.
When was the case filed?
Tool v. Advanced Cutting Tool was filed on 11/20/1985. It was terminated on 05/19/1989.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8827043 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).