Toro Company, The v. TurfCentric, Inc
Toro Company, The v. TurfCentric, Inc is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 07/14/2009 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case was terminated on 10/22/2009.
- Court
- District Court, D. Minnesota (D. Minnesota)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Michael J. Davis · 14,277 cases in index
- Docket number
- 0:09-cv-01839
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 07/14/2009
- Date terminated
- 10/22/2009
1,593 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · The Toro Company Industrial Machinery & Equipment · 150 cases
- defendant · TurfCentric, Inc
Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern
This is one of 2 Patent cases in our index naming TurfCentric, Inc — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Toro Company, The v. TurfCentric, Inc?
Toro Company, The v. TurfCentric, Inc is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 07/14/2009 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case was terminated on 10/22/2009. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Minnesota, docket number 0:09-cv-01839.
When was the case filed?
Toro Company, The v. TurfCentric, Inc was filed on 07/14/2009. It was terminated on 10/22/2009.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record (docket 12667882).