Tung v. Sears
Tung v. Sears is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 06/23/2014 in the District Court, N.D. Illinois. The case was terminated on 03/01/2016.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Illinois (N.D. Ill.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Charles R. Norgle, Sr · 6,956 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:14-cv-04699
- Cause
- 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
28 U.S.C. § 1332 — Diversity jurisdiction - Nature of suit
- 190 Contract: Other
General breach-of-contract disputes not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity
- Jury demand
- Plaintiff
- Date filed
- 06/23/2014
- Date terminated
- 03/01/2016
32,338 Contract cases in this court are indexed here.
About Contract Lawsuits
Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Tung v. Sears?
Tung v. Sears is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 06/23/2014 in the District Court, N.D. Illinois. The case was terminated on 03/01/2016. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Contract” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Illinois, docket number 1:14-cv-04699.
When was the case filed?
Tung v. Sears was filed on 06/23/2014. It was terminated on 03/01/2016.
What law is the case brought under?
The docket lists the cause as 28 U.S.C. § 1332 — Diversity jurisdiction.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Contract Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record (docket 4262100).