Turnpike Tom v. Hellman
Turnpike Tom v. Hellman is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 07/01/1992 in the District Court, N.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 05/24/1993.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Ohio (N.D. Ohio)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Frank J. Battisti · 610 cases in index
- Docket number
- 4:92-cv-01339
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 07/01/1992
- Date terminated
- 05/24/1993
1,169 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Turnpike Tom · 20 cases
- defendant · Hellman · 64 cases
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Turnpike Tom v. Hellman?
Turnpike Tom v. Hellman is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 07/01/1992 in the District Court, N.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 05/24/1993. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Ohio, docket number 4:92-cv-01339.
When was the case filed?
Turnpike Tom v. Hellman was filed on 07/01/1992. It was terminated on 05/24/1993.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9599429 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:92-cv-01339 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).