Tva v. Mahathy
Tva v. Mahathy is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 11/04/1992 in the District Court, N.D. Alabama. The case was terminated on 04/27/1993.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Alabama (N.D. Ala.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Robert B Propst · 1,973 cases in index
- Docket number
- 4:92-cv-02594
- Nature of suit
- 380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property. - Jurisdiction
- Government plaintiff
- Date filed
- 11/04/1992
- Date terminated
- 04/27/1993
1,665 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Tva v. Mahathy?
Tva v. Mahathy is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 11/04/1992 in the District Court, N.D. Alabama. The case was terminated on 04/27/1993. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Alabama, docket number 4:92-cv-02594.
When was the case filed?
Tva v. Mahathy was filed on 11/04/1992. It was terminated on 04/27/1993.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9620997 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:92-cv-02594 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).