Ty Inc v. Simplicity Pattern
Ty Inc v. Simplicity Pattern is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 11/19/1999 in the District Court, N.D. Illinois. The case was terminated on 02/24/2000.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Illinois (N.D. Ill.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Charles P. Kocoras · 5,838 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:99-cv-07570
- Cause
- 17:101 Copyright Infringement
17 U.S.C. § 101 — Copyright Act - Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
- Jury demand
- Plaintiff
- Date filed
- 11/19/1999
- Date terminated
- 02/24/2000
6,030 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Ty Inc · 194 cases
- defendant · Simplicity Pattern · 4 cases
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Ty Inc v. Simplicity Pattern?
Ty Inc v. Simplicity Pattern is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 11/19/1999 in the District Court, N.D. Illinois. The case was terminated on 02/24/2000. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Illinois, docket number 1:99-cv-07570.
When was the case filed?
Ty Inc v. Simplicity Pattern was filed on 11/19/1999. It was terminated on 02/24/2000.
What law is the case brought under?
The docket lists the cause as 17 U.S.C. § 101 — Copyright Act.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record (docket 11037082).