Tyson v. Dushefgski
Tyson v. Dushefgski is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 11/15/1986 in the District Court, E.D. Michigan. The case was terminated on 05/10/1988.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Michigan (E.D. Mich.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 11/15/1986
- Date terminated
- 05/10/1988
2,198 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Tyson · 508 cases
- defendant · Dushefgski
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Tyson v. Dushefgski?
Tyson v. Dushefgski is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 11/15/1986 in the District Court, E.D. Michigan. The case was terminated on 05/10/1988. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Michigan.
When was the case filed?
Tyson v. Dushefgski was filed on 11/15/1986. It was terminated on 05/10/1988.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8615610 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).