Docket Nexus — Federal court records.
Forfeiture / Penalty Lawsuit

U S A v. Pittenger

Forfeiture / Penalty Terminated 10/21/1987 District Court, E.D. New York

U S A v. Pittenger is a federal forfeiture / penalty lawsuit filed on 09/04/1986 in the District Court, E.D. New York. The case was terminated on 10/21/1987.

A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.

Court
District Court, E.D. New York (E.D.N.Y)
Official Court Website →
Docket number
Nature of suit
690 Other forfeiture and penalty suits
Other civil forfeiture or federal penalty actions.
Jurisdiction
Government plaintiff
Date filed
09/04/1986
Date terminated
10/21/1987

580 Forfeiture / Penalty cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

About Forfeiture / Penalty Lawsuits

Forfeiture and penalty cases involve the government seeking to seize property connected to alleged unlawful activity, or the imposition of federal civil penalties.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is U S A v. Pittenger?

U S A v. Pittenger is a federal forfeiture / penalty lawsuit filed on 09/04/1986 in the District Court, E.D. New York. The case was terminated on 10/21/1987. Forfeiture and penalty cases involve the government seeking to seize property connected to alleged unlawful activity, or the imposition of federal civil penalties.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Forfeiture / Penalty” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Forfeiture and penalty cases involve the government seeking to seize property connected to alleged unlawful activity, or the imposition of federal civil penalties.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, E.D. New York.

When was the case filed?

U S A v. Pittenger was filed on 09/04/1986. It was terminated on 10/21/1987.

Other Cases Involving These Parties

Related Forfeiture / Penalty Cases

Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8531932 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).