US v. Daniel A. Hoffmann
US v. Daniel A. Hoffmann is a federal forfeiture / penalty lawsuit filed on 01/05/1988 in the District Court, N.D. California. The case was terminated on 06/24/1988.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. California (N.D. Cal.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 690 Other forfeiture and penalty suits
Other civil forfeiture or federal penalty actions. - Jurisdiction
- Government plaintiff
- Date filed
- 01/05/1988
- Date terminated
- 06/24/1988
180 Forfeiture / Penalty cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · US · 14721 cases
- defendant · Daniel A. Hoffmann
About Forfeiture / Penalty Lawsuits
Forfeiture and penalty cases involve the government seeking to seize property connected to alleged unlawful activity, or the imposition of federal civil penalties.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is US v. Daniel A. Hoffmann?
US v. Daniel A. Hoffmann is a federal forfeiture / penalty lawsuit filed on 01/05/1988 in the District Court, N.D. California. The case was terminated on 06/24/1988. Forfeiture and penalty cases involve the government seeking to seize property connected to alleged unlawful activity, or the imposition of federal civil penalties.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Forfeiture / Penalty” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Forfeiture and penalty cases involve the government seeking to seize property connected to alleged unlawful activity, or the imposition of federal civil penalties.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. California.
When was the case filed?
US v. Daniel A. Hoffmann was filed on 01/05/1988. It was terminated on 06/24/1988.
Related Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 62677519 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).