Docket Nexus — Federal court records.
Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuit

US v. Morishige,owen Etal

Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Terminated 04/10/1991 District Court, D. Hawaii

US v. Morishige,owen Etal is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 12/27/1989 in the District Court, D. Hawaii. The case was terminated on 04/10/1991.

A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.

Court
District Court, D. Hawaii (D. Haw.)
Official Court Website →
Docket number
Nature of suit
870 Tax suits
Federal tax disputes with the United States as a party.
Jurisdiction
Government plaintiff
Date filed
12/27/1989
Date terminated
04/10/1991

1,296 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits

This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is US v. Morishige,owen Etal?

US v. Morishige,owen Etal is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 12/27/1989 in the District Court, D. Hawaii. The case was terminated on 04/10/1991. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, D. Hawaii.

When was the case filed?

US v. Morishige,owen Etal was filed on 12/27/1989. It was terminated on 04/10/1991.

Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases

Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9248607 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).