US v. One 1988 Gmc Conversion Van
US v. One 1988 Gmc Conversion Van is a federal forfeiture / penalty lawsuit filed on 11/14/1989 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case was terminated on 07/16/1990.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Minnesota (D. Minnesota)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 625 Drug related seizure of property
Government forfeiture of property connected to alleged drug activity. - Jurisdiction
- Government plaintiff
- Date filed
- 11/14/1989
- Date terminated
- 07/16/1990
98 Forfeiture / Penalty cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · US · 14721 cases
- defendant · One 1988 Gmc Conversion Van
About Forfeiture / Penalty Lawsuits
Forfeiture and penalty cases involve the government seeking to seize property connected to alleged unlawful activity, or the imposition of federal civil penalties.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is US v. One 1988 Gmc Conversion Van?
US v. One 1988 Gmc Conversion Van is a federal forfeiture / penalty lawsuit filed on 11/14/1989 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case was terminated on 07/16/1990. Forfeiture and penalty cases involve the government seeking to seize property connected to alleged unlawful activity, or the imposition of federal civil penalties.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Forfeiture / Penalty” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Forfeiture and penalty cases involve the government seeking to seize property connected to alleged unlawful activity, or the imposition of federal civil penalties.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Minnesota.
When was the case filed?
US v. One 1988 Gmc Conversion Van was filed on 11/14/1989. It was terminated on 07/16/1990.
Related Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9223889 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).