US v. Rushing
US v. Rushing is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 02/04/1993 in the District Court, C.D. California. The case was terminated on 04/13/1993.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, C.D. California (C.D. Cal.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 153 Recovery of overpayments of vet benefits
Actions to recover overpaid veterans' benefits. - Jurisdiction
- Government plaintiff
- Date filed
- 02/04/1993
- Date terminated
- 04/13/1993
52,728 Contract cases in this court are indexed here.
About Contract Lawsuits
Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is US v. Rushing?
US v. Rushing is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 02/04/1993 in the District Court, C.D. California. The case was terminated on 04/13/1993. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Contract” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, C.D. California.
When was the case filed?
US v. Rushing was filed on 02/04/1993. It was terminated on 04/13/1993.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Contract Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9618884 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).