Valsoft Corporation, Inc v. Bacalan

Court

District Court, D. New Hampshire (D.N.H.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Joseph N. Laplante · 627 cases in index

Docket number

1:19-cv-00672

Cause

28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
28 U.S.C. § 1332 — Diversity jurisdiction

Nature of suit

190 Contract: Other
General breach-of-contract disputes not covered by a more specific category.

Jurisdiction

Diversity

Jury demand

Plaintiff

Date filed

06/19/2019

Date terminated

10/02/2020

2,337 Contract cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Valsoft Corporation Inc · 3 cases
• defendant · Bacalan

About Contract Lawsuits

Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Valsoft Corporation, Inc v. Bacalan?

Valsoft Corporation, Inc v. Bacalan is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 06/19/2019 in the District Court, D. New Hampshire. The case was terminated on 10/02/2020. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Contract” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, D. New Hampshire, docket number 1:19-cv-00672.

When was the case filed?

Valsoft Corporation, Inc v. Bacalan was filed on 06/19/2019. It was terminated on 10/02/2020.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 28 U.S.C. § 1332 — Diversity jurisdiction.