Varnado v. Harms
Varnado v. Harms is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 05/21/1997 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case was terminated on 06/27/1997.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Minnesota (D. Minnesota)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Michael J. Davis · 14,277 cases in index
- Docket number
- 0:97-cv-01243
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 05/21/1997
- Date terminated
- 06/27/1997
966 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Varnado v. Harms?
Varnado v. Harms is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 05/21/1997 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case was terminated on 06/27/1997. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Minnesota, docket number 0:97-cv-01243.
When was the case filed?
Varnado v. Harms was filed on 05/21/1997. It was terminated on 06/27/1997.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10418662 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 0:97-cv-01243 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).