Waintroob v. Basch
Waintroob v. Basch is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 08/08/2001 in the District Court, D. Arizona. The case was terminated on 09/07/2001.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Arizona (D. Ariz.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Lawrence O Anderson · 242 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:01-cv-01470
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 08/08/2001
- Date terminated
- 09/07/2001
827 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Waintroob v. Basch?
Waintroob v. Basch is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 08/08/2001 in the District Court, D. Arizona. The case was terminated on 09/07/2001. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Arizona, docket number 2:01-cv-01470.
When was the case filed?
Waintroob v. Basch was filed on 08/08/2001. It was terminated on 09/07/2001.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 11252138 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:01-cv-01470 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).