Waldman v. Citibank
Waldman v. Citibank is a federal antitrust lawsuit filed on 10/09/2001 in the District Court, S.D. New York. The case was terminated on 12/30/2004.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. New York (S.D.N.Y.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 410 Antitrust
Claims of unlawful restraint of trade, monopolization, or anticompetitive conduct under the Sherman and Clayton Acts. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 10/09/2001
- Date terminated
- 12/30/2004
2,262 Antitrust cases in this court are indexed here.
About Antitrust Lawsuits
Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Waldman v. Citibank?
Waldman v. Citibank is a federal antitrust lawsuit filed on 10/09/2001 in the District Court, S.D. New York. The case was terminated on 12/30/2004. Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Antitrust” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. New York.
When was the case filed?
Waldman v. Citibank was filed on 10/09/2001. It was terminated on 12/30/2004.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Antitrust Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 14092357 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).