Warner Bros v. Doe
Warner Bros v. Doe is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 01/15/1993 in the District Court, D. New Jersey. The case was terminated on 06/18/1993.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. New Jersey (D.N.J.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Maryanne Trump Barry · 2,106 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:93-cv-00109
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 01/15/1993
- Date terminated
- 06/18/1993
3,390 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Warner Bros · 40 cases
- defendant · Doe · 12886 cases
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Warner Bros v. Doe?
Warner Bros v. Doe is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 01/15/1993 in the District Court, D. New Jersey. The case was terminated on 06/18/1993. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. New Jersey, docket number 2:93-cv-00109.
When was the case filed?
Warner Bros v. Doe was filed on 01/15/1993. It was terminated on 06/18/1993.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9578645 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:93-cv-00109 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).