Wells v. Phillips Etal
Wells v. Phillips Etal is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 11/29/1984 in the District Court, D. Massachusetts. The case was terminated on 07/25/1988.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Massachusetts (D. Mass.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 11/29/1984
- Date terminated
- 07/25/1988
2,924 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Wells · 2496 cases
- defendant · Phillips Etal · 19 cases
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Wells v. Phillips Etal?
Wells v. Phillips Etal is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 11/29/1984 in the District Court, D. Massachusetts. The case was terminated on 07/25/1988. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Massachusetts.
When was the case filed?
Wells v. Phillips Etal was filed on 11/29/1984. It was terminated on 07/25/1988.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8740935 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).