Werthman v. Quiring Etal
Werthman v. Quiring Etal is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 07/23/1985 in the District Court, C.D. Illinois. The case was terminated on 01/22/1988.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, C.D. Illinois (C.D. Ill.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 07/23/1985
- Date terminated
- 01/22/1988
492 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Werthman · 8 cases
- defendant · Quiring Etal · 2 cases
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Werthman v. Quiring Etal?
Werthman v. Quiring Etal is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 07/23/1985 in the District Court, C.D. Illinois. The case was terminated on 01/22/1988. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, C.D. Illinois.
When was the case filed?
Werthman v. Quiring Etal was filed on 07/23/1985. It was terminated on 01/22/1988.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8645945 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).