Wilburn v. Schultz Etl
Wilburn v. Schultz Etl is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 10/26/1987 in the District Court, E.D. Tennessee. The case was terminated on 06/17/1988.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Tennessee (E.D. Tenn.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 371 Truth in lending
Claims under the Truth in Lending Act over consumer-credit disclosures. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 10/26/1987
- Date terminated
- 06/17/1988
695 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Wilburn · 232 cases
- defendant · Schultz Etl · 2 cases
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Wilburn v. Schultz Etl?
Wilburn v. Schultz Etl is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 10/26/1987 in the District Court, E.D. Tennessee. The case was terminated on 06/17/1988. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Tennessee.
When was the case filed?
Wilburn v. Schultz Etl was filed on 10/26/1987. It was terminated on 06/17/1988.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8631695 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).