Wilson v. Ake
Wilson v. Ake is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 07/20/2004 in the District Court, M.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 03/08/2005.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, M.D. Florida (M.D. Fla.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- James S. Moody, Jr · 4,096 cases in index
- Docket number
- 8:04-cv-01680
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 07/20/2004
- Date terminated
- 03/08/2005
2,335 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Wilson v. Ake?
Wilson v. Ake is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 07/20/2004 in the District Court, M.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 03/08/2005. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, M.D. Florida, docket number 8:04-cv-01680.
When was the case filed?
Wilson v. Ake was filed on 07/20/2004. It was terminated on 03/08/2005.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 2290537 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 8:04-cv-01680 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).