Windhorst v. Swift & Staley Inc

Court

District Court, W.D. Kentucky (W.D. Ky.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Thomas B. Russell · 4,405 cases in index

Docket number

5:16-cv-00077

Cause

29:0215fl FLSA: Prohibited Acts
29 U.S.C. § 215fl

Nature of suit

710 Labor: Fair Standards
Unpaid-wage and overtime claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

Plaintiff

Date filed

05/24/2016

Date terminated

05/26/2017

2,907 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Windhorst · 7 cases
• defendant · Swift & Staley, Inc · 2 cases

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 3 Labor cases in our index naming SWIFT & STALEY, INC — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

About Labor Lawsuits

Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Windhorst v. Swift & Staley Inc?

Windhorst v. Swift & Staley Inc is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 05/24/2016 in the District Court, W.D. Kentucky. The case was terminated on 05/26/2017. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, W.D. Kentucky, docket number 5:16-cv-00077.

When was the case filed?

Windhorst v. Swift & Staley Inc was filed on 05/24/2016. It was terminated on 05/26/2017.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 29 U.S.C. § 215fl.