Witt v. Cmt Tools
Witt v. Cmt Tools is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 10/25/1994 in the District Court, S.D. Iowa. The case was terminated on 06/01/1995.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. Iowa (S.D. Iowa)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Harold D. Vietor · 1,169 cases in index
- Docket number
- 4:94-cv-70717
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 10/25/1994
- Date terminated
- 06/01/1995
256 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Witt v. Cmt Tools?
Witt v. Cmt Tools is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 10/25/1994 in the District Court, S.D. Iowa. The case was terminated on 06/01/1995. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. Iowa, docket number 4:94-cv-70717.
When was the case filed?
Witt v. Cmt Tools was filed on 10/25/1994. It was terminated on 06/01/1995.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10015359 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:94-cv-70717 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).