Wu v. Li
Wu v. Li is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 01/02/1992 in the District Court, N.D. Illinois. The case was terminated on 03/08/1993.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Illinois (N.D. Ill.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Milton I. Shadur · 5,387 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:92-cv-00002
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 01/02/1992
- Date terminated
- 03/08/1993
5,089 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Wu v. Li?
Wu v. Li is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 01/02/1992 in the District Court, N.D. Illinois. The case was terminated on 03/08/1993. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Illinois, docket number 1:92-cv-00002.
When was the case filed?
Wu v. Li was filed on 01/02/1992. It was terminated on 03/08/1993.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9631844 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:92-cv-00002 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).