Xlear v. Prohealth
Xlear v. Prohealth is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 08/20/2008 in the District Court, D. Utah. The case was terminated on 01/26/2009.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Utah (D. Utah)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Dale A. Kimball · 2,380 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:08-cv-00629
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 08/20/2008
- Date terminated
- 01/26/2009
1,135 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Xlear v. Prohealth?
Xlear v. Prohealth is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 08/20/2008 in the District Court, D. Utah. The case was terminated on 01/26/2009. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Utah, docket number 2:08-cv-00629.
When was the case filed?
Xlear v. Prohealth was filed on 08/20/2008. It was terminated on 01/26/2009.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 12426125 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:08-cv-00629 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).