Xlear v. Renewal Science
Xlear v. Renewal Science is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 03/02/2016 in the District Court, D. Utah. The case was terminated on 02/07/2017.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Utah (D. Utah)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Ted Stewart · 1,958 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:16-cv-00172
- Cause
- 35:0271 Patent Infringement
35 U.S.C. § 271 — Patent infringement - Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
- Jury demand
- None
- Date filed
- 03/02/2016
- Date terminated
- 02/07/2017
1,135 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Xlear · 21 cases
- defendant · Renewal Science
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Xlear v. Renewal Science?
Xlear v. Renewal Science is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 03/02/2016 in the District Court, D. Utah. The case was terminated on 02/07/2017. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Utah, docket number 2:16-cv-00172.
When was the case filed?
Xlear v. Renewal Science was filed on 03/02/2016. It was terminated on 02/07/2017.
What law is the case brought under?
The docket lists the cause as 35 U.S.C. § 271 — Patent infringement.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 4403048 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:16-cv-00172 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).