Yohe v. Frutkin
Yohe v. Frutkin is a federal banking / commerce lawsuit filed on 08/12/1994 in the District Court, N.D. Indiana. The case was terminated on 12/22/1994.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Indiana (N.D. Ind.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- William C Lee · 2,721 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:94-cv-00237
- Nature of suit
- 450 Interstate commerce
Disputes under federal commerce and interstate-commerce regulation. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 08/12/1994
- Date terminated
- 12/22/1994
101 Banking / Commerce cases in this court are indexed here.
About Banking / Commerce Lawsuits
These cases involve banking, financial institutions, and interstate commerce regulation, including disputes over loans, deposits, and federally regulated commercial activity.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Yohe v. Frutkin?
Yohe v. Frutkin is a federal banking / commerce lawsuit filed on 08/12/1994 in the District Court, N.D. Indiana. The case was terminated on 12/22/1994. These cases involve banking, financial institutions, and interstate commerce regulation, including disputes over loans, deposits, and federally regulated commercial activity.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Banking / Commerce” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve banking, financial institutions, and interstate commerce regulation, including disputes over loans, deposits, and federally regulated commercial activity.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Indiana, docket number 1:94-cv-00237.
When was the case filed?
Yohe v. Frutkin was filed on 08/12/1994. It was terminated on 12/22/1994.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Banking / Commerce Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 13649114 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:94-cv-00237 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).