Young v. McLean
Young v. McLean is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 03/02/2011 in the District Court, D. Kansas. The case was terminated on 05/04/2011.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Kansas (D. Kan.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Kathryn H. Vratil · 3,275 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:11-cv-02125
- Nature of suit
- 380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 03/02/2011
- Date terminated
- 05/04/2011
2,521 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Young v. McLean?
Young v. McLean is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 03/02/2011 in the District Court, D. Kansas. The case was terminated on 05/04/2011. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Kansas, docket number 2:11-cv-02125.
When was the case filed?
Young v. McLean was filed on 03/02/2011. It was terminated on 05/04/2011.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 12824241 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:11-cv-02125 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).