Younger v. Olson-Kennedy
Younger v. Olson-Kennedy is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 11/20/2024 in the District Court, C.D. California. The case was terminated on 12/02/2024.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, C.D. California (C.D. Cal.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- 2:24-cv-10049
- Cause
- 31:3729 False Claims Act
31 U.S.C. § 3729 — False Claims Act - Nature of suit
- 376 Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a))
Whistleblower (qui tam) actions brought on behalf of the government. - Jurisdiction
- U.S. Government Plaintiff
- Jury demand
- None
- Date filed
- 11/20/2024
- Date terminated
- 12/02/2024
4,123 Other Civil cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Younger · 146 cases
- defendant · Olson-Kennedy
About Other Civil Lawsuits
These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Younger v. Olson-Kennedy?
Younger v. Olson-Kennedy is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 11/20/2024 in the District Court, C.D. California. The case was terminated on 12/02/2024. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Other Civil” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, C.D. California, docket number 2:24-cv-10049.
When was the case filed?
Younger v. Olson-Kennedy was filed on 11/20/2024. It was terminated on 12/02/2024.
What law is the case brought under?
The docket lists the cause as 31 U.S.C. § 3729 — False Claims Act.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Other Civil Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 69399137 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:24-cv-10049 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).