Complaint Against Eli Lilly and Company , Filed by Tania Lee. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Warriner, C.)
,
as
of the estate of , deceased.
Novo Nordisk Inc. Novo Nordisk A/S Eli Lilly and Company Lilly USA, LLC other(s) (identify): IDENTIFICATION OF PARTIES
Plaintiff(s)
1.
Full (first, middle, and last) name of Plaintiff injured/deceased due to use of GLP- 1 RA Product(s): Eddie Banks
2.
If applicable, full name(s) and representative capacity of Plaintiff(s) alleging wrongful death claim:
,
as
of the estate of , deceased.
3.
If applicable, full name(s) of Plaintiff(s) alleging survival claims, as permitted under state law(s):
4.
If applicable, full name(s) of Plaintiff(s) alleging loss of consortium or loss of services: Kirk Banks Defendant(s)
5.
Plaintiff(s)/Decedent's Representative is/are suing the following Defendant(s) (check all that apply):
Novo Nordisk Inc. Novo Nordisk A/S Eli Lilly and Company Lilly USA, LLC other(s) (identify): IDENTIFICATION OF PARTIES
Plaintiff(s)
1.
Full (first, middle, and last) name of Plaintiff injured/deceased due to use of GLP- 1 RA Product(s): Eddie Banks
2.
If applicable, full name(s) and representative capacity of Plaintiff(s) alleging wrongful death claim:
,
as
of the estate of , deceased.
3.
If applicable, full name(s) of Plaintiff(s) alleging survival claims, as permitted under state law(s):
4.
If applicable, full name(s) of Plaintiff(s) alleging loss of consortium or loss of services: Kirk Banks Defendant(s)
5.
Plaintiff(s)/Decedent's Representative is/are suing the following Defendant(s) (check all that apply):
Novo Nordisk Inc. Novo Nordisk A/S Eli Lilly and Company Lilly USA, LLC other(s) (identify): Tania Lee N/A N/A
N/A
6.
City and state of Plaintiff(s)' current residence (or in a case brought on behalf of a Decedent, Decedent's last permanent residence): Mount Dora, Florida
7.
State where Plaintiff/Decedent was prescribed the GLP-1RA Product(s) at issue: Florida
8.
State of Plaintiff's/Decedent's residence at time of their use of the GLP-1RA Product(s) at issue: Florida
9.
City and state of Plaintiff(s)'/Decedent's residence at time of diagnosis of injury: 10.
Jurisdiction is based on:
diversity of citizenship pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 other (plead in sufficient detail as required by applicable rules):
11.
The District Court(s) where Plaintiff(s) might have otherwise filed this Short Form Complaint, absent this Court's CMO No. 14, and/or to where remand could be ordered: Middle District of Florida
6.
City and state of Plaintiff(s)' current residence (or in a case brought on behalf of a Decedent, Decedent's last permanent residence): Mount Dora, Florida
7.
State where Plaintiff/Decedent was prescribed the GLP-1RA Product(s) at issue: Florida
8.
State of Plaintiff's/Decedent's residence at time of their use of the GLP-1RA Product(s) at issue: Florida
9.
City and state of Plaintiff(s)'/Decedent's residence at time of diagnosis of injury: 10.
Jurisdiction is based on:
diversity of citizenship pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 other (plead in sufficient detail as required by applicable rules):
11.
The District Court(s) where Plaintiff(s) might have otherwise filed this Short Form Complaint, absent this Court's CMO No. 14, and/or to where remand could be ordered: Middle District of Florida Pompano Beach, Florida Florida Florida Lantana, Florida
Southern District of Florida
claims occurred there;
_______ other (plead in sufficient detail as required by applicable rules):
Venue is proper in the District Court identified in Paragraph 11 because:
a substantial part of the events and omissions giving rise to Plaintiff(s)' claims occurred there; other (plead in sufficient detail as required by applicable rules):
13.
If applicable, identify the citizenship of any additional Defendant(s) named above: 12.
Venue is proper in the District Court identified in Paragraph 11 because:
a substantial part of the events and omissions giving rise to Plaintiff(s)' claims occurred there; other (plead in sufficient detail as required by applicable rules):
13.
If applicable, identify the citizenship of any additional Defendant(s) named above:
Ozempic (semaglutide) Wegovy (semaglutide) Rybelsus (oral semaglutide) Saxenda (liraglutide) Trulicity (dulaglutide) Mounjaro (tirzepatide) Zepbound (tirzepatide) other(s) (identify):
14.
Plaintiff/Decedent used the following GLP-1 RA Product(s) for which claims are being asserted in this case (check all that apply):
Ozempic (semaglutide) Wegovy (semaglutide) Rybelsus (oral semaglutide) Saxenda (liraglutide) Trulicity (dulaglutide) Mounjaro (tirzepatide) Zepbound (tirzepatide) other(s) (identify):
15.
To the best of Plaintiff(s)' knowledge, Plaintiff/Decedent used GLP-1 RA Product(s) during the following approximate date range(s) (month(s) and year(s)) (if multiple products, specify date range(s) for each product): December 2020 to July 2023
14.
Plaintiff/Decedent used the following GLP-1 RA Product(s) for which claims are being asserted in this case (check all that apply):
Ozempic (semaglutide) Wegovy (semaglutide) Rybelsus (oral semaglutide) Saxenda (liraglutide) Trulicity (dulaglutide) Mounjaro (tirzepatide) Zepbound (tirzepatide) other(s) (identify):
15.
To the best of Plaintiff(s)' knowledge, Plaintiff/Decedent used GLP-1 RA Product(s) during the following approximate date range(s) (month(s) and year(s)) (if multiple products, specify date range(s) for each product): December 2020 to July 2023
10/06/2022 until 06/2024
Read the full filing
You’re reading pages 1–5 of 11. Register free to read the complete 11-page transcript on this page.
Register free to continue reading →
These are public U.S. federal court records, available free from PACER and the court. Registration unlocks our full on-page transcript — a convenience service.
Public U.S. federal court record (district court docket 73111657, document 1). Source via the RECAP Archive (Free Law Project). The same record is available from PACER. Informational only — not legal advice.