Docket Nexus — Federal court records.

Complaint Against Eli Lilly and Company , Filed by Tania Lee. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Warriner, C.)

Document #1 Filed 03/30/2026 · 11 pages · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · View original PDF
1Full (first, middle, and last) name of Plaintiff injured/deceased due to use of GLP- 1 RA Product(s):
2If applicable, full name(s) and representative capacity of Plaintiff(s) alleging wrongful death claim:

,

as

of the estate of , deceased.

3If applicable, full name(s) of Plaintiff(s) alleging survival claims, as permitted under state law(s):
4If applicable, full name(s) of Plaintiff(s) alleging loss of consortium or loss of services: Defendant(s)
5Plaintiff(s)/Decedent’s Representative is/are suing the following Defendant(s) (check all that apply):

Novo Nordisk Inc. Novo Nordisk A/S Eli Lilly and Company Lilly USA, LLC other(s) (identify): IDENTIFICATION OF PARTIES

Plaintiff(s)

1.

Full (first, middle, and last) name of Plaintiff injured/deceased due to use of GLP- 1 RA Product(s): Eddie Banks

2.

If applicable, full name(s) and representative capacity of Plaintiff(s) alleging wrongful death claim:

,

as

of the estate of , deceased.

3.

If applicable, full name(s) of Plaintiff(s) alleging survival claims, as permitted under state law(s):

4.

If applicable, full name(s) of Plaintiff(s) alleging loss of consortium or loss of services: Kirk Banks Defendant(s)

5.

Plaintiff(s)/Decedent's Representative is/are suing the following Defendant(s) (check all that apply):

Novo Nordisk Inc. Novo Nordisk A/S Eli Lilly and Company Lilly USA, LLC other(s) (identify): IDENTIFICATION OF PARTIES

Plaintiff(s)

1.

Full (first, middle, and last) name of Plaintiff injured/deceased due to use of GLP- 1 RA Product(s): Eddie Banks

2.

If applicable, full name(s) and representative capacity of Plaintiff(s) alleging wrongful death claim:

,

as

of the estate of , deceased.

3.

If applicable, full name(s) of Plaintiff(s) alleging survival claims, as permitted under state law(s):

4.

If applicable, full name(s) of Plaintiff(s) alleging loss of consortium or loss of services: Kirk Banks Defendant(s)

5.

Plaintiff(s)/Decedent's Representative is/are suing the following Defendant(s) (check all that apply):

Novo Nordisk Inc. Novo Nordisk A/S Eli Lilly and Company Lilly USA, LLC other(s) (identify): Tania Lee N/A N/A

N/A

 JURISDICTION AND VENUE
6City and state of Plaintiff(s)’ current residence (or in a case brought on behalf of a Decedent, Decedent’s last permanent residence):
7State where Plaintiff/Decedent was prescribed the GLP-1RA Product(s) at issue:
8State of Plaintiff’s/Decedent’s residence at time of their use of the GLP-1RA Product(s) at issue:
9City and state of Plaintiff(s)’/Decedent’s residence at time of diagnosis of injury:
10Jurisdiction is based on: _______ diversity of citizenship pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 _______ other (plead in sufficient detail as required by applicable rules):
11The District Court(s) where Plaintiff(s) might have otherwise filed this Short Form Complaint, absent this Court’s CMO No. 14, and/or to where remand could be ordered:
JURISDICTION AND VENUE

6.

City and state of Plaintiff(s)' current residence (or in a case brought on behalf of a Decedent, Decedent's last permanent residence): Mount Dora, Florida

7.

State where Plaintiff/Decedent was prescribed the GLP-1RA Product(s) at issue: Florida

8.

State of Plaintiff's/Decedent's residence at time of their use of the GLP-1RA Product(s) at issue: Florida

9.

City and state of Plaintiff(s)'/Decedent's residence at time of diagnosis of injury: 10.

Jurisdiction is based on:

diversity of citizenship pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 other (plead in sufficient detail as required by applicable rules):

11.

The District Court(s) where Plaintiff(s) might have otherwise filed this Short Form Complaint, absent this Court's CMO No. 14, and/or to where remand could be ordered: Middle District of Florida

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

6.

City and state of Plaintiff(s)' current residence (or in a case brought on behalf of a Decedent, Decedent's last permanent residence): Mount Dora, Florida

7.

State where Plaintiff/Decedent was prescribed the GLP-1RA Product(s) at issue: Florida

8.

State of Plaintiff's/Decedent's residence at time of their use of the GLP-1RA Product(s) at issue: Florida

9.

City and state of Plaintiff(s)'/Decedent's residence at time of diagnosis of injury: 10.

Jurisdiction is based on:

diversity of citizenship pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 other (plead in sufficient detail as required by applicable rules):

11.

The District Court(s) where Plaintiff(s) might have otherwise filed this Short Form Complaint, absent this Court's CMO No. 14, and/or to where remand could be ordered: Middle District of Florida Pompano Beach, Florida Florida Florida Lantana, Florida



Southern District of Florida

12Venue is proper in the District Court identified in Paragraph 11 because: _______ a substantial part of the events and omissions giving rise to Plaintiff(s)’

claims occurred there;

_______ other (plead in sufficient detail as required by applicable rules):

13If applicable, identify the citizenship of any additional Defendant(s) named above: 12.

Venue is proper in the District Court identified in Paragraph 11 because:

a substantial part of the events and omissions giving rise to Plaintiff(s)' claims occurred there; other (plead in sufficient detail as required by applicable rules):

13.

If applicable, identify the citizenship of any additional Defendant(s) named above: 12.

Venue is proper in the District Court identified in Paragraph 11 because:

a substantial part of the events and omissions giving rise to Plaintiff(s)' claims occurred there; other (plead in sufficient detail as required by applicable rules):

13.

If applicable, identify the citizenship of any additional Defendant(s) named above:

 PRODUCT USE
14Plaintiff/Decedent used the following GLP-1 RA Product(s) for which claims are being asserted in this case (check all that apply):

Ozempic (semaglutide) Wegovy (semaglutide) Rybelsus (oral semaglutide) Saxenda (liraglutide) Trulicity (dulaglutide) Mounjaro (tirzepatide) Zepbound (tirzepatide) other(s) (identify):

15To the best of Plaintiff(s)’ knowledge, Plaintiff/Decedent used GLP-1 RA Product(s) during the following approximate date range(s) (month(s) and year(s)) (if multiple products, specify date range(s) for each product):
PRODUCT USE

14.

Plaintiff/Decedent used the following GLP-1 RA Product(s) for which claims are being asserted in this case (check all that apply):

Ozempic (semaglutide) Wegovy (semaglutide) Rybelsus (oral semaglutide) Saxenda (liraglutide) Trulicity (dulaglutide) Mounjaro (tirzepatide) Zepbound (tirzepatide) other(s) (identify):

15.

To the best of Plaintiff(s)' knowledge, Plaintiff/Decedent used GLP-1 RA Product(s) during the following approximate date range(s) (month(s) and year(s)) (if multiple products, specify date range(s) for each product): December 2020 to July 2023

PRODUCT USE

14.

Plaintiff/Decedent used the following GLP-1 RA Product(s) for which claims are being asserted in this case (check all that apply):

Ozempic (semaglutide) Wegovy (semaglutide) Rybelsus (oral semaglutide) Saxenda (liraglutide) Trulicity (dulaglutide) Mounjaro (tirzepatide) Zepbound (tirzepatide) other(s) (identify):

15.

To the best of Plaintiff(s)' knowledge, Plaintiff/Decedent used GLP-1 RA Product(s) during the following approximate date range(s) (month(s) and year(s)) (if multiple products, specify date range(s) for each product): December 2020 to July 2023



10/06/2022 until 06/2024

Read the full filing

You’re reading pages 1–5 of 11. Register free to read the complete 11-page transcript on this page.

Register free to continue reading →

These are public U.S. federal court records, available free from PACER and the court. Registration unlocks our full on-page transcript — a convenience service.

advertisement

Public U.S. federal court record (district court docket 73111657, document 1). Source via the RECAP Archive (Free Law Project). The same record is available from PACER. Informational only — not legal advice.