Austin v. Cox Communications Incorporated

Court

District Court, D. Arizona (D. Ariz.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Angela M. Martinez · 12 cases in index

Docket number

4:26-cv-00160

Cause

47:227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
47 U.S.C. § 227 — Telephone Consumer Protection Act

Nature of suit

485 Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)
Claims over unsolicited calls, texts, or faxes under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

Plaintiff

Date filed

03/27/2026

2,646 RICO / Consumer / Other Statutes cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Austin · 1917 cases
• defendant · Cox Communications Incorporated · 6 cases

• #1 · Class Action Complaint. Filing Fee Received: $ 405.00, Receipt Number AAZDC-25404821 Filed by Rachel Austin. (Radbil, Aaron)
  • Civil Cover Sheet
  03/27/2026 Request Document
• #2 · Summons Submitted by Rachel Austin. (Radbil, Aaron) 03/27/2026 Request Document
• #3 · Filing Fee Paid, Receipt Number AAZDC-25404821. This Case Has Been Assigned to the Honorable Angela M Martinez. All Future Pleadings or Documents Should Bear the Correct Case Number: CV-26-160-TUC-AMM. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction Form Attached 03/27/2026 Request Document
• #4 · Summons Issued as to Cox Communications Incorporated. . *** Important: When Printing the Summons, Select "Document and Stamps" or "Document and Comments" for the Seal to Appear on the Document 03/27/2026 Request Document
• Remark re Pro Hac Vice Motion 03/30/2026 Request Document
• Remark: Pro Hac Vice Motion (s) Granted for Aaron Radbil on Behalf of Plaintiff Rachel Austin. This Is a Text Entry Only. There Is No PDF Document Associated with This Entry 03/30/2026 Request Document
• #5 · Service Executed Filed by Rachel Austin: Affidavit of Service on April 1, 2026. (Radbil, Aaron) 04/03/2026 Request Document
• #6 · Service Executed 04/21/2026 Request Document
• #7 · Notice of Voluntary Dismissal - Entire Case/Action 07/07/2026 Request Document
• #8 · Order Dismissing Case 07/22/2026 Request Document

These are public U.S. federal court records. Filings already in the free RECAP archive can be viewed at no charge; “Request document” retrieves a copy from PACER on your behalf for a convenience fee. The same records are available directly from PACER and the court.

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 7 RICO / Consumer / Other Statutes cases in our index naming Cox Communications Incorporated — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

• Bergman v. Cox Communications Incorporated
  District Court, D. ArizonaFiled 12/20/2017

About RICO / Consumer / Other Statutes Lawsuits

This group covers federal statutory claims such as RICO (racketeering), consumer-protection statutes, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and other federal causes of action that don't fall under a more specific category.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Austin v. Cox Communications Incorporated?

Austin v. Cox Communications Incorporated is a federal rico / consumer / other statutes lawsuit filed on 03/27/2026 in the District Court, D. Arizona. The case is currently open in the federal court system. This group covers federal statutory claims such as RICO (racketeering), consumer-protection statutes, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and other federal causes of action that don't fall under a more specific category.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “RICO / Consumer / Other Statutes” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal statutory claims such as RICO (racketeering), consumer-protection statutes, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and other federal causes of action that don't fall under a more specific category.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, D. Arizona, docket number 4:26-cv-00160.

When was the case filed?

Austin v. Cox Communications Incorporated was filed on 03/27/2026. The case is currently open.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 47 U.S.C. § 227 — Telephone Consumer Protection Act.