Caperton v. Bulk Molding Compounds, Inc

Court

District Court, N.D. Ohio (N.D. Ohio)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Vernelis K. Armstrong · 343 cases in index

Docket number

3:12-cv-01172

Cause

29:2661 Family Medical Leave Act
29 U.S.C. § 2661

Nature of suit

751 Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Claims over medical or family leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

Plaintiff

Date filed

05/11/2012

Date terminated

09/25/2012

12,795 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Caperton · 24 cases
• defendant · Bulk Molding Compounds,inc · 4 cases

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 5 Labor cases in our index naming BULK MOLDING COMPOUNDS,INC — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

About Labor Lawsuits

Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Caperton v. Bulk Molding Compounds, Inc?

Caperton v. Bulk Molding Compounds, Inc is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 05/11/2012 in the District Court, N.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 09/25/2012. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, N.D. Ohio, docket number 3:12-cv-01172.

When was the case filed?

Caperton v. Bulk Molding Compounds, Inc was filed on 05/11/2012. It was terminated on 09/25/2012.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 29 U.S.C. § 2661.