Castanon v. Solopop 1 Corp

Court

District Court, District of Columbia (D.D.C.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Reggie B. Walton · 1,723 cases in index

Docket number

1:15-cv-00788

Cause

15:2(a) Fair Labor Standards Act
15 U.S.C. § 2 — Sherman Act (monopolization)

Nature of suit

710 Labor: Fair Standards
Unpaid-wage and overtime claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

None

Date filed

05/28/2015

Date terminated

11/16/2015

6,070 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Castanon · 27 cases
• defendant · Solopop 1 Corp

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 2 Labor cases in our index naming SOLOPOP 1 CORP — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

About Labor Lawsuits

Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Castanon v. Solopop 1 Corp?

Castanon v. Solopop 1 Corp is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 05/28/2015 in the District Court, District of Columbia. The case was terminated on 11/16/2015. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, District of Columbia, docket number 1:15-cv-00788.

When was the case filed?

Castanon v. Solopop 1 Corp was filed on 05/28/2015. It was terminated on 11/16/2015.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 15 U.S.C. § 2 — Sherman Act (monopolization).