Davis v. Kay
Davis v. Kay is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 11/07/1995 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case was terminated on 02/12/1996.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Minnesota (D. Minnesota)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- John R. Tunheim · 9,092 cases in index
- Docket number
- 4:95-cv-00734
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 11/07/1995
- Date terminated
- 02/12/1996
4,756 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Davis v. Kay?
Davis v. Kay is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 11/07/1995 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case was terminated on 02/12/1996. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Minnesota, docket number 4:95-cv-00734.
When was the case filed?
Davis v. Kay was filed on 11/07/1995. It was terminated on 02/12/1996.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10218647 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:95-cv-00734 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).