Gross v. Canon
Gross v. Canon is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 08/21/1991 in the District Court, D. Connecticut. The case was terminated on 06/17/1992.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Connecticut (D. Conn.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Jose A. Cabranes · 753 cases in index
- Docket number
- 5:91-cv-00459
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 08/21/1991
- Date terminated
- 06/17/1992
862 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Gross v. Canon?
Gross v. Canon is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 08/21/1991 in the District Court, D. Connecticut. The case was terminated on 06/17/1992. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Connecticut, docket number 5:91-cv-00459.
When was the case filed?
Gross v. Canon was filed on 08/21/1991. It was terminated on 06/17/1992.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9297926 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 5:91-cv-00459 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).